Compliance

Featured image for Beyond the Workers’ Compensation Claim showing a spreadsheet of workplace compensation costs on an office computer.

Beyond the Workers’ Compensation Claim: What Queensland Courts Are Now Awarding for Psychiatric Injury at Work

A Queensland council paid $2.35 million to a former employee last year. Not for a physical injury. For a psychiatric injury caused by a fabricated email that a third party wrote in her name — and which the council failed to publicly correct.  That figure is the point of this article. Employers have adjusted to the idea that psychological injury generates […]

Beyond the Workers’ Compensation Claim: What Queensland Courts Are Now Awarding for Psychiatric Injury at Work Read More »

Featured image for Privacy Reform Hits HR showing a December 2026 calendar with 10 December highlighted alongside privacy, security and compliance symbols.

Privacy Reform Hits HR: The Statutory Tort, the Employee Records Exemption, and the December 2026 Deadline for Automated Decisions

Two things have changed in Australian privacy law that most HR functions have not yet absorbed.  The first is already in force: since 10 June 2025, individuals can sue for a serious invasion of privacy — and the employee records exemption does not apply to that action. The second lands on 10 December 2026, when employers using software to make

Privacy Reform Hits HR: The Statutory Tort, the Employee Records Exemption, and the December 2026 Deadline for Automated Decisions Read More »

Featured image for “Performance Management That Holds Up” showing an office desk with a laptop, performance charts, workflow documents and reports.

Performance Management That Holds Up: Why a Valid Reason Is Only Half the Defence

An engineer with thirty years’ experience was dismissed for genuinely substandard work. Missed deadlines. Quality problems. A welding error that halted a production line.  The Fair Work Commission accepted there was a valid reason to dismiss him. He won anyway — and was awarded compensation of $21,471.15 plus superannuation — because the employer had no formal performance management process and gave him

Performance Management That Holds Up: Why a Valid Reason Is Only Half the Defence Read More »

Two colleagues discussing redundancy documents in an office, representing redundancy pay and alternative employment considerations.

Can Redundancy Pay Be Reduced? What “Other Acceptable Employment” Really Means Under Section 120

Most employers know that a genuine redundancy triggers redundancy pay. Far fewer know that the Fair Work Commission can reduce that payment — sometimes to nothing — where the employer has obtained other acceptable employment for the employee.  And far fewer still appreciate the sting in the test: whether the alternative employment is “acceptable” is judged objectively. It does

Can Redundancy Pay Be Reduced? What “Other Acceptable Employment” Really Means Under Section 120 Read More »

Featured image showing stacks of employment documents and contracts on a desk, representing the complexities of determining whether a worker is a contractor or employee under Australian workplace laws.

Contractor or Employee? Why One Worker Can Be Both — and What Misclassification Now Costs

“They invoice us. They have an ABN. They’re a contractor.”  That reasoning has never been enough, and in 2026 it is actively dangerous. A single worker can be a contractor at common law, an employee for superannuation purposes, and a deemed employee for payroll tax — all at the same time, under three different tests. 

Contractor or Employee? Why One Worker Can Be Both — and What Misclassification Now Costs Read More »

Featured image showing a calendar highlighting a seven-day period alongside a calculator and money, representing Payday Super, pay-cycle superannuation payments and employer payroll obligations.

Payday Super Is Here: What Employers Must Fix Now That Superannuation Is a Pay-Cycle Obligation

For decades, superannuation was a quarterly problem. You accrued it, you reconciled it, and you paid it within 28 days of the quarter’s end. From 1 July 2026 that model is gone.  Superannuation is now a pay-cycle obligation: contributions must be received by the employee’s fund within seven business days of payday. Miss it — even by a day, even by a small amount — and

Payday Super Is Here: What Employers Must Fix Now That Superannuation Is a Pay-Cycle Obligation Read More »

Non-compete agreement marked out beside a 2027 calendar block, representing proposed changes to non-compete clauses in Australian employment contracts.

The End of the Standard Non-Compete: How to Protect Your Business Before the 2027 Restraint Reforms

There is a clause in almost every Australian employment contract that most employers have never tested, many could not enforce, and a great number are about to lose.  The Government has announced that from 2027 it will ban non-compete clauses for workers earning below the Fair Work Act high-income threshold, and prohibit wage-fixing and no-poach agreements between businesses. The reforms are not law yet. But the work

The End of the Standard Non-Compete: How to Protect Your Business Before the 2027 Restraint Reforms Read More »

Featured image for The Employer’s Compliance Calendar 2026–27 showing a digital compliance timeline alongside workplace policy and legal folders.

Six Changes, Eighteen Months: The Australian Employer’s Compliance Calendar for 2026 and 2027

Most employers do not get caught out by the law they never heard of. They get caught out by the change they heard about, filed away, and did not diarise.  Between 1 July 2026 and the end of 2027 there are six separate changes with hard start dates, each requiring a different function to act — payroll, HR,

Six Changes, Eighteen Months: The Australian Employer’s Compliance Calendar for 2026 and 2027 Read More »

Featured image showing a workplace team collaborating, representing psychosocial risk management, psychological safety, and WHS compliance in Australian workplaces.

Managing Psychosocial Risks in the Workplace: Why a Policy Alone Won’t Protect You

What’s the real issue?  Having a psychosocial health and safety policy is not the same as managing psychosocial risk and regulators increasingly treat the gap as a breach. The most common mistake we see is treating this as an HR document rather than a WHS obligation owned by senior leadership exactly the “Band-Aid solution” the Model Code of Practice warns against.  A

Managing Psychosocial Risks in the Workplace: Why a Policy Alone Won’t Protect You Read More »

Manager discussing a flexible work request with an employee across a desk, with legal symbols including scales of justice, a gavel, and hybrid work icons representing Australian workplace flexibility and Fair Work compliance.

Flexible Work Requests: What Recent Fair Work Commission Decisions Require of Employers

What’s the real issue?  Since the 2023 changes to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), how you handle a flexible work request now matters as much as whether you say yes or no. Under section 65B, the Fair Work Commission (FWC) can now arbitrate refused requests — and order you to grant one anyway if you did not follow the

Flexible Work Requests: What Recent Fair Work Commission Decisions Require of Employers Read More »

Professional working on a laptop with a shadow silhouette and digital security icons representing AI governance, privacy, and employment risks in the workplace.

Shadow AI in the Workplace: How Australian Employers Can Manage the Governance, Privacy and Employment Risks

Shadow AI is the use of artificial intelligence tools by employees for work — without the employer’s knowledge, approval or oversight, usually through public generative AI chatbots opened straight from a browser.  The answer is not a blanket ban, which simply drives use underground. The answer is governance: a clear AI acceptable-use policy, staff training, clear data rules, human

Shadow AI in the Workplace: How Australian Employers Can Manage the Governance, Privacy and Employment Risks Read More »

Featured image showing a calculator, financial documents, and payroll calculations, representing annualised salaries, set-off arrangements, payroll compliance, and employee wage entitlements under Australian employment law.

The Salary Trap: What the Coles and Woolworths Decision Means for Annualised Salaries and Set-Off Arrangements

If you pay an annual salary to award-covered staff, the Coles and Woolworths underpayment decision should be on your radar. Paying a generous salary that “washes out” over a year is no longer enough: a set-off must satisfy award entitlements in each pay period — not on average across the year. That point redraws the compliance map for Australian

The Salary Trap: What the Coles and Woolworths Decision Means for Annualised Salaries and Set-Off Arrangements Read More »

Featured image showing a balance scale with employee figures, a vacant office chair under a magnifying glass, and redundancy symbols, representing reasonable redeployment assessments during a genuine redundancy process.

Reasonable Redeployment in Genuine Redundancy: Why “No Vacancies” Is No Longer Enough After the High Court’s Helensburgh Decision

When you make a role redundant, can you rely on the fact that there were simply no other jobs going? Not any more.  Following the High Court’s 2025 decision in the Helensburgh Coal matter, “reasonable redeployment” under section 389 of the Fair Work Act now reaches beyond a list of vacant positions — in some cases it extends

Reasonable Redeployment in Genuine Redundancy: Why “No Vacancies” Is No Longer Enough After the High Court’s Helensburgh Decision Read More »

Featured image showing an open office doorway leading to a workplace, symbolising an employee's return to work, injury recovery, workplace reintegration, and employer responsibilities under Australian employment and WHS laws.

Return to Work Under Pressure: Managing Injury, Capacity and Employer Risk in the Australian Workplace

Managing ill and injured employees is one of the highest-risk tasks any Australian employer faces. When a worker is injured or falls ill, several legal regimes switch on at once — and they don’t always agree. Get it right and you protect your people and your organisation. Get it wrong and one termination can trigger multiple claims.  Here’s how to do it —

Return to Work Under Pressure: Managing Injury, Capacity and Employer Risk in the Australian Workplace Read More »

Featured image showing a clock and office telephone symbolising the critical first 48 hours after a serious workplace incident, highlighting the urgency of employer response, WHS compliance, and incident management.

The First 48 Hours After a Serious Workplace Incident: An Employer’s Response Plan

When a worker is killed or seriously injured at work, the first 48 hours shape everything that follows — your legal exposure, your standing with the WHS regulator, the wellbeing of your people, and your ability to defend any future prosecution. The best predictor of a good response is having an incident-response plan ready before anything happens. 

The First 48 Hours After a Serious Workplace Incident: An Employer’s Response Plan Read More »

Featured image showing workplace investigation documents, a clipboard checklist, office files, and a pen, representing procedural fairness, workplace investigations, and compliant HR processes.

Workplace Investigations Done Right: How to Protect Your Organisation Through Process, Procedural Fairness and Privilege

A well-run workplace investigation is one of the strongest risk-management tools an Australian employer has. Done properly, it gives you a defensible basis to act on misconduct. Done poorly, the investigation itself becomes the liability — often costing more than the original complaint.  The difference comes down to process: right scope, procedural fairness, privilege considered early, and

Workplace Investigations Done Right: How to Protect Your Organisation Through Process, Procedural Fairness and Privilege Read More »

Featured image showing a manager reviewing probation documents with a new employee, representing probation management, performance discussions, and employer obligations under the Fair Work Act.

Probation Done Properly: What Employer Obligations Under the Fair Work Act Really Mean

Probation is not a legal safe zone. Ending employment during probation removes unfair dismissal exposure — but not a general protections claim, a discrimination complaint, or a breach of contract. Getting the fundamentals right keeps you out of trouble.  What’s the real issue?  Employers routinely confuse two very different things:  A contractual probation period — a creature of contract

Probation Done Properly: What Employer Obligations Under the Fair Work Act Really Mean Read More »

Featured image showing balanced scales with HR, legal, and psychological safety symbols, representing the intersection of employment law, WHS obligations, and psychosocial risk management in Australian workplaces.

When HR Decisions Become WHS Risks: Managing the Intersection Between Psychosocial Safety Law and Employment Law

Performance-manage an underperformer, restructure a team or investigate a bullying complaint, and you are no longer working within employment law alone. That decision now sits inside your work health and safety duty — and a process that is perfectly lawful under the Fair Work Act can still expose you under WHS legislation.  The answer is not to

When HR Decisions Become WHS Risks: Managing the Intersection Between Psychosocial Safety Law and Employment Law Read More »

Featured image showing a diverse team of employees collaborating in a workplace meeting, representing employer leadership, workplace respect, and proactive prevention of sexual harassment under Australia's positive duty laws.

The Positive Duty Explained: How Australian Employers Prevent Sexual Harassment at Work

The biggest shift in Australian sexual harassment law is not a new penalty or complaint form. It is a change in who must act, and when.  Under the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth), employers now carry a positive duty — a proactive, ongoing obligation to take reasonable and proportionate measures to eliminate sexual harassment, sex discrimination, sex-based harassment, hostile work environments and victimisation, so far as possible. 

The Positive Duty Explained: How Australian Employers Prevent Sexual Harassment at Work Read More »

Featured image showing legal scales, a shield with people icons, workplace documents, and silhouettes of employees, representing general protections claims and Fair Work Commission case management for Australian employers.

General Protections Claims: What the Fair Work Commission’s New Case Management Means for Australian Employers

The Fair Work Commission has overhauled how general protections claims are run, and the shift favours prepared employers. Representation is decided “on the papers” before conference; out-of-time applications are triaged before you are served; conciliation is a fast 60-minute, resolution-only session; and a new Early Dispute Resolution (EDR) pilot tests informal settlement calls soon after lodgement. The reforms reward preparation

General Protections Claims: What the Fair Work Commission’s New Case Management Means for Australian Employers Read More »

HR professionals discussing Queensland Child Safe Laws, Child Safe Standards and employer compliance requirements.

Queensland’s Child Safe Laws: Everything Employers Need to Know

I want to start with a number. 28.5%. That is the proportion of Australians who have experienced child sexual abuse, according to the 2023 Australian Child Maltreatment Study. Of those, approximately 75% experienced it more than once. These are not rare events. This is not a problem confined to certain families or certain communities. This

Queensland’s Child Safe Laws: Everything Employers Need to Know Read More »

Two business professionals reviewing workplace compliance documents in a modern office ahead of major Australian employment law changes taking effect on 1 July 2026.

What’s changing on 1 July 2026 — and what to do about it before it lands

Every July brings a wave of workplace law changes. Most years you can absorb them with a payroll update and a quick policy review. 2026 is not that year.  The changes landing on 1 July 2026 are structural — not cosmetic. They alter how super is paid, how parental leave is funded, what counts as

What’s changing on 1 July 2026 — and what to do about it before it lands Read More »

HR manager reviewing pay and award compliance documents in Australia

Pay and Award Compliance in Australia: A Back-to-Basics Guide for Employers

Why Pay and Award Compliance Matters in Australia Pay and award compliance in Australia has become a major focus for employers, regulators, and the Fair Work Ombudsman. With increasing audits, penalties, and high-profile underpayment cases, businesses must ensure they meet their legal obligations under workplace laws. In our recent HR Bites webinar: Back to Basics

Pay and Award Compliance in Australia: A Back-to-Basics Guide for Employers Read More »

New-Gender-Equality-Targets-for-Employers

WGEA Gender Equality Targets are Coming in 2026 – Here’s What Smart Employers Should Do Now

If you employ 500+ people, you’ve probably already heard the headlines: WGEA gender equality targets are coming. But what’s worth paying attention to isn’t just the compliance requirement, it’s what these changes signal about where workplace expectations are heading in Australia. From 2026, employers captured under the legislation (known as Designated Relevant Employers) will be required to select and commit to three gender equality targets, with at least one being numeric. Employers

WGEA Gender Equality Targets are Coming in 2026 – Here’s What Smart Employers Should Do Now Read More »

2025 Employment Law Updates: Insights from Christy Miller, Partner at Clayton Utz

At our 2025 End-of-Year event, we were privileged to host Christy Miller, Partner at Clayton Utz, who delivered a timely and engaging presentation titled “The Ghosts of Christmas Past, Present and Future (Also known as the 2025 Employment Law Updates).” The session provided essential updates and practical guidance for business leaders navigating the evolving landscape

2025 Employment Law Updates: Insights from Christy Miller, Partner at Clayton Utz Read More »

Harrisons Annual HR Compliance Check

Annual HR Compliance Check: Why Now Is the Time to Act

As the new financial year begins, there’s no better time for Australian businesses to conduct a comprehensive HR compliance check. In our recent HR Bites webinar, Kelly Hallett, Head of HR Team Services at Harrisons, shared essential insights to help business owners, managers, and HR leaders stay on top of their compliance obligations. A recent

Annual HR Compliance Check: Why Now Is the Time to Act Read More »

Scroll to Top